When Chrystia Freeland Said that the Extradition of Huawei CFO, Sabrina Meng Wanzhou, Was Strictly a Judicial Affair, Was She Lying? Or Just Avoiding the Truth?
Generally, I have been a Freeland admirer (see Saint Mathew Pray for Us ). I sympathized as she stood beside Mike Pompeo at a Washington press conference and had to come up with six different ways of saying that the arrest, detention and possible extradition of Huawei CFO, Sabrina Meng Wanzhou, was strictly a judicial affair--and in a "rule of law" country like Canada, the process was immune from political interference. I believed her. I had already read the same claim in half a dozen news reports. I repeated the claim myself. When a claim gets repeated that often, it's hard to resist the idea that it must be true. Then, I had a look at the Canadian Extradition Act . Here is what the Extradition Act actually says: Withdrawal of the authority to proceed (3) The Minister may at any time withdraw the authority to proceed and, if the Minister does so, the court shall discharge the person and set aside any order made respecting their judicial interim releas