Alberta separatism gets Fox News attention

cut and paste from Global News

Alberta separatism gets Fox News attention after Carney-Trump meeting

By Sean Boynton  Global News

Posted May 8, 2025 3:53 pm

 Updated May 8, 2025 6:46 pm

 5 min read 

The renewed push to have Alberta separate from Canada has caught the eyes of some pundits on Fox News, who are suggesting the discontent could play into the larger trade and security negotiations between Canada and U.S. President Donald Trump.

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced this week that she doesn’t want Alberta to leave Canada but, if enough residents sign a petition asking for a referendum on it, she’ll make sure it’s put to a vote in 2026.

A new Angus Reid poll released Thursday found 36 per cent of Albertans would either vote to separate from Canada or lean toward voting that way, whole more than 60 per cent opposed such a vote.

Smith — who delivered her speech a day before Prime Minister Mark Carney met with Trump at the White House — also presented a list of demands for Carney’s new Liberal government, and threatened to take steps to assert Alberta’s sovereignty if Ottawa didn’t address the province’s grievances.

Those remarks, and the calls for secession from some Alberta residents, played into the coverage of the Carney-Trump sit-down on Fox News this week.

“President Trump is sensing weakness and I think he smells blood,” Jeanine Pirro said Tuesday during a discussion on the popular panel show The Five.

“If there is a sense in Canada that the people aren’t happy, if the provinces that have talked about seceding are saying that the Canadian federal government is not concerned about them, it may be that Trump is sensing this and he’s going to target them, and that all of this (negotiations between Trump and Carney) is just kind of, like, another discussion, but it’s really about those places that want to secede.”

Pirro suggested Quebec also wants to secede, despite the sovereigntist Bloc Quebecois’ diminished seats in the recent federal election and recent polling suggesting Trump’s attacks on Canada’s sovereignty and economy have dampened the separatist movement.

Co-host Jesse Watters went even further in response to Pirro, suggesting Alberta alone could become America’s 51st state instead of Canada as a whole, as Trump has repeatedly called for.

“I think we want Alberta, because they’re the powerhouse,” he said. “They have all the oil, they have all the minerals. … They’re also conservative in Alberta, so it’s not a great, beautiful line like what you’d see (as a combined Canada with the U.S.) but it would just kind of look like a big Florida that would shoot up north. But it would give us access to the Arctic.

“There’s going to be a referendum, I don’t know if it’s going to be possible, but I like how he’s using the leverage. If these people want to go, just use that as a little pressure point to exploit them for concessions.”

The same day, while talking about the White House meeting, Fox Business anchor David Asman brought up the Alberta separatism movement and Smith’s remarks from Monday, including what he said was her claim that Alberta is “not getting anything from the federal government.”

“I think Donald Trump and this 51st state thing is playing into that, what’s going on in Canada, he said.

“He could chip off a piece at a time and do business with the very oil-rich section of Canada,” anchor Martha MacCallum responded in agreement.

Political analysts had predicted earlier this week that Smith’s speech would likely be noticed by decision-makers and media in the U.S. Trump has been known to regularly watch and publicly comment on Fox News programs.

“It doesn’t strengthen Canada’s position,” Lori Williams, a political science professor at Mount Royal University in Calgary, told Global News.

“People in the United States, the strategists there, are going to be looking for any chinks in the armour, and this is something that they might want to try to exploit or take advantage of.”

A spokesperson for Smith’s office told Global News the premier is focused on securing a fair deal with Ottawa and “listening to and governing on behalf of all Albertans.”

“The premier has been very clear, she supports a strong and sovereign Alberta within a united Canada,” spokesperson Sam Blackett said in an emailed statement.

“The premier has no mandate to and will not entertain negotiations for Alberta to become a part of the United States. She will continue to advocate alongside her provincial and federal counterparts for a strong and prosperous trade relationship between Canada and the U.S.”

Smith travelled to Florida to meet with Trump in January before his inauguration, after he first threatened sweeping tariffs on Canada. She has also appeared on Fox News herself to argue against tariffs and propose strengthening U.S. business and energy ties.

The premier was also criticized for telling Breitbart News on the eve of the federal election campaign that she wanted the Trump administration to “pause” its tariffs to avoid boosting the Liberals.

Carney met with Canada’s premiers Wednesday and discussed “building projects of national interest to diversify the economy, create higher-paying jobs, and build one Canadian economy instead of 13,” according to a readout from the Prime Minister’s Office.

Smith said after the meeting there’s an emerging consensus among premiers that federal regulations need to be cleared away to allow for “nation building projects” and investment, which Carney has also publicly supported.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford, who has said he doesn’t want Alberta to secede, said Wednesday he told Carney that it’s time his government started “showing some love” to Alberta and Saskatchewan, where there has also been talk of separation recently.

Thursday’s Angus Reid poll found 33 per cent of people in Saskatchewan strongly or somewhat supported a vote to separate, with 59 per cent opposed.

The pollster found in a poll last month that 30 per cent of Albertans support separatism, which Angus Reid noted was down from 60 per cent who said in 2019 they were open to joining a western separatist movement.

A February poll from Ipsos found 30 per cent of Albertans believe either their province, Quebec or both will separate from Canada within the next 10 years, while 28 per cent said they would vote for their newly-independent province to join the U.S.

The poll found that nationally, younger Canadians aged 18-35 were more likely to voice support for their province or country joining the U.S. compared to older Canadians. Nearly one-third of younger respondents said it was “only a matter of time” before Canada and the U.S. become a single, unified country.

How Do We Solve a Problem Like Danielle Smith?

Comparing Danielle Smith and René Lévesque 

I compare Danielle Smith to René Lévesque.  Exceptional communicators, with a history in broadcasting before entering politics, politically savvy, and with an in-depth knowledge of their constituency and constituents in both cases.  Both have shown the capacity to talk about sovereignty in subtle, sub-textual, svelte terms that make provincial secession sound benign.  However, neither has shown concern about what happens to Canada post-secession. Neither has ever acknowledged that we already live in the best country in the world.  Despite historical and regional grudges we live largely in harmony occupying the second largest and potentially richest territory in the world.  Neither sovereigntist has been prepared to discuss the stability, unity and existence of the country they are prepared to risk in favour of whatever imagined benefits provincial independence might offer. 

Canada Is a great country!

Canada is a great country.  But saying so is un-Canadian.  We use the expression "Great Canadian" to be sardonic.  But who are we mocking?  Ourselves in part.  More pointedly, our American neighbours to the south, and their obsessive, self-aggrandizing declarations of greatness, especially these days.  In certain times, our humility and deference serve us poorly.  We are living through one of those times.

People gather in support of Alberta becoming the 51st state during a rally at the Legislature in Edmonton, on May 3.  [Image from the Globe and Mail]

Doing Nothing and denial are dangerous

How do we address the potential dismemberment of Canada which Danielle Smith foregrounds and forebodes?  A typical Canadian response is denial, "it will never happen," and the liberal notion that "everything will turn out fine if we do nothing."  I believe we are facing the exception to these rules.

In his interview with Tara Henley on Lean Out, Darrell Bricker, the CEO of Ipsos Public Affairs,  says,

I think that sometimes central Canadian people dismiss Western separatism as an issue of a few cranks out there in a couple of bars in rural Alberta or whatever. I don't think that that's what we're dealing with now. I think when you saw Danielle Smith's presentation yesterday, I mean, this is not nothing. Something is going on here. And by the way, I don't think the real question in Alberta is secession. I think it's more annexation [ . . .].

The Numbers aren't great

Polling on December 10, 2024, suggested that 66% of Albertans disagree with the province becoming a 51st US state.  More recent AngusReid polling suggests that 36% of Albertans support leaving confederation.  As someone who lived in Quebec during the election of René Lévesque's Parti Quebecois in 1976, the 1980 referendum and 1995 referendum--and witnessed the polling numbers changing dramatically in the space of two weeks in 1995--I do not find these Alberta numbers particularly reassuring.

How we kept Quebec in Canada in 1995

In the 1995 referendum vote, we (Canadian federalists) managed to keep Quebec in the Canadian confederation by just over half a percentage point (50.58%).  How did we do it?  To quote Jacques Parizeau's post-referendum complaint : "l'argent."   This chapter of Canadian history should be called "How Chuck Guite saved Canada and was punished for it."  During the 1995 referendum campaign, Guité, a federal civil servant, bent the rules and funnelled money to a Quebec advertising firm to promote Canadian unity.  His cavalier awarding of contracts in 1995 and beyond led to his eventually being found guilty of fraud and sentenced to three and a half years in prison.  Prosecutors complained of Guité's lack of remorse when he argued that he had been working to save the country in what amounted to "a war."

Time To do some nation building

Despite this cautionary tale of Chuck Guité, the results prove that an active campaign to keep Quebec in Canada mattered.  Tens of thousands (by some counts hundred of thousands) of Canadians paraded in Montreal in support of Quebec remaining in Canada.  Canadians nation-wide were encouraged to contact friends and relatives in Quebec rallying the vote against separation.  And, of course, there was a heartfelt and sometimes quite witty campaign inside Quebec on behalf of Canada.

This Time it's really serious

Alberta separation threatens to be much more acute and challenging.  This time, as the USA eyes the Alberta prize, what Danielle Smith calls "the Texas of the north,"  money (legal or otherwise) will flow in from the south in quantities even the Canadian government will find hard to match.  Quebec separatists talked a lot about waiting for the right economic conditions for independence.  Unlike Quebec, Alberta isn't looking forward to receiving equalization payments from the federal government.  For Alberta, the economic conditions are already in place.  Keith Spicer, Canada's Commissioner of Official Languages, once quipped that Quebec couldn't separate because there was nowhere for Quebec to go.  Again, not so for Alberta, as the USA will be all too eager to suggest annexation.

Advertising Matters

It's time to start selling Canada to Albertans.  We might want to start by selling the idea of Canada to ourselves with a bit more enthusiasm and vigour.  There isn't going to be a better time than now.

How Do You Solve a Problem LLIke Danielle Smith?

Danielle Smith promises Alberta separation referendum if signatures warrant

Just in case you didn't believe my previous post on Danielle Smith:  

Danielle Smith Is a Serious Threat to Canada’s Survival as a Country.

Cut and paste from Global News:  https://globalnews.ca/news/11165096/alberta-danielle-smith-address-may-5-2025/

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith says she would hold a referendum on provincial separation next year if citizens gather the required signatures on a petition.

Smith, in a livestream address, says she wants a sovereign Alberta within a united Canada but the voices of those unhappy with Confederation are not fringe extremists and must be listened to.

“The vast majority of these individuals are not fringe voices to be marginalized or vilified. They are loyal Albertans. They are, quite literally, our friends and neighbors who’ve just had enough of having their livelihoods and prosperity attacked by a hostile federal government,” Smith said.The speech comes a week after Smith’s United Conservative government introduced legislation that, if passed, will sharply reduce the bar petitioners need to meet to trigger a provincial referendum.

The bill, introduced the day after the federal election, would change citizen-initiated referendum rules to require a petition signed by 10 per cent of the eligible voters in a previous general election — down from 20 per cent of total registered voters.

Applicants would also get 120 days, rather than 90, to collect the required 177,000 signatures.

“To be clear from the outset, our government will not be putting a vote on separation from Canada on the referendum ballot,” Smith said on Monday.

“However, if there is a successful citizen-led referendum petition that is able to gather the requisite number of signatures requesting such a question to be put on a referendum, our government will respect the democratic process and include that question on the 2026 provincial referendum ballot, as well.”

As Prime Minister Mark Carney prepares to meet U.S. President Donald Trump in person in Washington on Tuesday to discuss the tariff trade war and other issues, Smith said Liberal rule has turned Canada into an international laughing  stock.“We have the most abundant and accessible natural resources of any country on Earth, and yet we landlock them, sell what we do produce to a single customer to the south of us while enabling polluting dictatorships to eat our lunch,” she said.

Addendum

Image from the Globe and Mail:

People gather in support of Alberta becoming the 51st state during a rally at the Legislature in Edmonton, on May 3.

Danielle Smith Is a Serious Threat to Canada’s Survival as a Country.

I first pointed out the threat which Danielle Smith posed to Canada in a post in October, 2022, when I referenced the chapter “Unlikely Canada” in Peter Zeihan’s The Accidental Super Power, published in 2015.  Zeihan adamantly predicted the break-up of Canada before 2030.  He foresaw Alberta becoming the 51st US state, following its independence from Canada initiated by the Wildrose Party lead by Danielle Smith.  In short, the threat she poses has been known and has grown for over 10 years and still no-one, with the possible exception of Michael Nabert on his Facebook page, seemed to be paying much attention . . . until this week.

Last Thursday, Smith was the featured guest at a fundraiser for PragerU in Florida.  PragerU is a right-wing propaganda machine which produces short videos in opposition to environmentalism, social programs, government bureaucracy and taxes.  PragerU videos are widely viewed online and are distributed to educational institutions in the USA.  The best way for you to understand PragerU is to visit the site yourself:  https://www.prageru.com/   Search Canada on the PragerU website if you would like to see samples of what Danielle Smith helped raise a million dollars in support of.

Since her appearance with right-wing podcaster Ben Shapiro, who advocated Canada becoming a 51st state, Smith has become a PragerU celebrity.  She was a guest for an hour-long interview with Marissa Streit, host and CEO of PragerU  (see below). 

Smith has justified her multiple trips to the USA (to Mara Largo, to the While House, and to Florida for PragerU) as diplomatic efforts against the Trump tariffs—to strengthen the USA-Canada relationship according to PragerU.  What we have been witnessing is the beginning of a courtship as Smith coyly points out what a good match Alberta and the USA would be—and Marissa Streit concurs.  As with any traditional courtship the message is in the subtext.  The obvious question of Canada’s becoming a 51st state was never asked, presumably by prior agreement.  Much of the interview dealt with the issue of transgenders, confirming that Smith’s attitudes were quite acceptable to PragerU Americans.  But the important sound bites came with Smith describing Alberta as the “Texas of the north,” with lots of oil, gas, cattle and grain.  Smith had the numbers ready and was more than happy to point out Alberta’s willingness to turn over its natural resources to the USA.  To make the geography clear to her American audience, Smith carefully pointed out that Alberta shares its border with Montana.  The unsaid:  no problem transporting all those Alberta resources and, of  course, Alberta has four times Montana’s population.  What more do you need to become a 51st state?  And a 51st state that can be counted on to vote Republican when the time comes.

When Smith was asked the “51st state” question during her “fireside chat” with Ben Shapiro, her answer was:

That would be like adding another California to your electoral system, and [you] would never have a Republican president in the White House again. So I would just caution you that it's probably best for us to just stay friends, and friends should never move in together.

Note that adding just Alberta wouldn’t be the same problem.  Smith hinted that Saskatchewan might also like to come along for the ride.

Recent polling suggests that 18% of Albertans favour Canada becoming a 51st state.  A Research Co poll carried out in December 2024 claims that 30% of Albertans believe the province would benefit from becoming part of the USA.   In his uninvited visit to Greenland, Vice-president J.D. Vance spelled out a vote for Greenland’s independence would lead to US hegemony over the island.  A referendum in favour of Alberta sovereignty, as Zeihan predicted in 2015, would eventually lead to statehood in the USA.

Preston Manning pulled back the covers on Western alienation, the Alberta sovereignty movement, and Smith’s subtext in a recent Globe and Mail editorial aimed at undermining a LIberal election.  Poor Pierre Poilieve had to once again distance himself from the support of his Conservative colleagues.  Manning got one thing right, the future of the nation is in play.  We do have to worry about Danielle Smith.

I Used to Think that Pierre Poilieve Was a Really Smart Guy that I Didn't Like Very Much

I decided that Pierre Poilieve was a nasty piece of work when he was casting aspersions on the character and credibility of the former Governor General of Canada, David Johnson. When Johnson was tasked with investigating claims of foreign interference in Canadian elections, Poilieve attempted to discredit him with sleazy, spurious, guilt-by-association claims that he was susceptible to corruption because he and Justin Trudeau owned neighbouring cottages.

Talk about karma!

After his having made such a fuss about foreign interference in Canadian elections, CSIS (Canadian Security and Intelligence Service) now has evidence that Poilieve's Conservative leadership campaign received illegal funding from India. Poilieve could have been informed of what CSIS discovered and gotten in front of the accusations but, to everyone's mystification, Poilieve has refused to go through the process of getting security clearance which would allow him to access intelligence gathering.  Poilieve's justification for refusing to get security clearance is so profoundly dumb, it is difficult to fathom.  In a nutshell his argument is "ignorance is truth" (a slogan from the novel 1984?).  He is attempting to claim that he would not be able to be honest and transparent with the Canadian electorate if he had access to top-secret intelligence.  He can only be honest if he remains ignorant.  He can only tell the truth if he doesn't know what he is talking about.  (Read those sentences again. I wrote them, and I don't get it.)  Poilieve couldn't possibly do a better job of creating the impression that he has something to hide than refusing to be vetted for a security clearance.

Then There's the double standard!

Poilieve brushes off the fact that his leadership campaign received illegal foreign funding with the claim that he won the nomination “fair and square.”  When Han Dong's campaign for the Liberal Party nomination in his riding was accused of getting support from China, Dong was forced out of the party, his political and personal reputation ruined . . . and he has received death threats. The accusations against Dong remain unproven.  Poilieve, despite proof of foreign interference in his nomination campaign,  has waved off the accusations as being of no consequence. 

Then There's fentanyl

When Donald Drumph launched his trojan-horse claims of fentanyl crossing the border from Canada into the USA (yes, yes, we all know now that more fentanyl moves the other way), Poilieve tried to jump on that horse-drawn bandwagon by announcing that he would impose mandatory sentences of life in prison for anyone caught with 40 milligrams of fentanyl.  Do you know how small a milligram is?  Fentanyl is an incredibly powerful and easily produced synthetic drug.  (The Reuters web page explains what we should know and need to know about fentanyl.)  Two milligrams of fentanyl is a potentially lethal dosage  The drug is deadly, but the campaign promise came across as flawed, failed opportunism pandering to Donald Trump.

Then there's Carney

With the change in Liberal leadership, a new Prime Minister, and a new political opponent, it seemed that Poilieve's existence had lost its meaning.  Slowly he came to realize that changing the names from Trudeau to Carney, accompanied by satanic-looking videos of Carney awash in red just weren't going to cut it, he pivoted back to the guilt-by-innuendo that he had used to discredit David Johnson.  Poilieve announced what he hoped would seem a scandalous revelation that when Mark Carney was a private citizen representing Brookfield, the Canadian asset management company (Poilieve holds investments n the same company by the way), Carney visited the vice-president of the Chinese central bank, "two weeks later Brookfield got a quarter-billion-dollar loan."  There are only two possible interpretations of these scandalous revelations: 1) these two events happened one after the other and are completely unrelated or 2) Mark Carney has shown that he can negotiate a deal with China, Canada’s second largest trading partner, which is beneficial to Canada and Canadians.  Who is Poilieve campaigning for?  Then he uses the press conference (above) for some out-of-date China bashing. Is Poilieve seriously trying to escalate our trade war with China while we are in the midst of a trade war with the USA?

Listening to Poilieve trying to spin yet another conspiracy theory, it occurred to me that maybe this is the advantage of not having a security clearance.  Since he doesn’t know anything, he can just make stuff up without being accused of lying.

Then the worst happened:  Danielle Smith

If nothing else sinks Poilieve’s campaign, Danielle Smith’s attempt to support him by telling Breibart News that Poilieve is “in sync with the new US administration” should do it.

Signs of Desperation

I can’t think of anything more desperate than the Conservative campaign’s attempt to turn a sound bit of Trump describing Poilieve as acting “stupidly” as evidence that Poilieve is the man we want as Prime Minister.

How Has Canada Ended Up in Trade Wars with China and the USA at the Same Time?

Here’s the chronology:

2015. The Justin Trudeau Liberals were elected with a plan to establish a free-trade agreement with China

2016.  Donald Trump was elected President of the USA and begins direct trade negotiations with Xi Jinping of China

2016-2017:  Plans for a Canada-China free-trade agreement are underway.

2018:  In January, Richard Donoghue, a lawyer working for Broadcom, becomes District Attorney for the Eastern District of New York

2018:  March 1, President Trump announces his intention to impose a 25% tariff on Canadian steel

2018:  In April, John Bolton becomes President Trump’s National Security Advisor

2018:  In October, Canada, USA and Mexico formally agree to the new NAFTA, the USMCA free-trade agreement which includes the “China clause” intended to block Canada from creating a free-trade agreement with China

2018:  December 1, John Bolton sets up a meeting between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping which he sarcastically describes as his “contribution to world peace.”  On the same day, under Bolton’s direction the FBI instructs Canadian Border Secrurity and the RCMP to  arrest Meng Wanzou the CFO and daughter of the founder of Huawei, the largest supplier of telecommunications equipment in the world, based on a warrant issued by Richard Donoghue.

2018-2019:  The Extradition Act is clear that the decision to extradite or release Meng is up to the Minister of Justice, Jody Wilson Raybould, after she has reviewed all the circumstances and determined if the request is fair or not.   Wilson Raybould issues a statement saying she takes her extradition responsiblities seriously but before she can do more she is demoted out of Justice for refusing to interfere in the prosecution of the engineering firm SNC Lavalin.  Wilson Raybould subsequently resigns.  The Lavalin scandal creates confusion because by law the Minister of Justice is not supposed to interfere in a case like SNC Lavalin but, by law, the Minister is supposed to decide the extradition case.  This difference never seemed to make its way to the Canadian public.

2018:  December 10, after the Canadian government had broken every law in the books including denial of  habeas corpus and ignoring the Canadian Extradition Act in the process of arresting Meng, the Chinese government followed suit and arrested Canadians Michael Korvik and Michael Spavor without just cause.  The Chinese government also began to restrict imports of Canadian produce and stalled plans to establish a Covid-vaccine laboratory in Canada--essentially initiating the Canada-China trade war which continues today.  Rather than releasing Meng, whom we now know was being held without justifiable cause, and arranging the release of the "two Michaels," the Canadian government in obedience and acquiescence to US policy continued to escalate tensions with China.

2020:  Weaponizing Human Rights, 24 hours before leaving office, Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo declared that China was committing genocide against the Uyghur population of Xinjiang. At least three reports were published accusing China of genocide and were extensively quoted in the press.  The newly appointed US Secretary of State, Anthony Blinken repeated Pompeo's claim of a genocide but made no official declaration.  In the UN's Assessment of human rights concerns in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, People’s Republic of China published in August, 2022, the word "genocide" never appears.

2021:  January 21, the Canadian House of Commons passed a non-binding resolution proposed by Erin O'Toole that China was perpetrating a genocide against its Muslim population.

2021:  December 23,  the US Congress passes the Forced Labour Act which requires Border Security to reject all imports from China that might be the result of forced labour unless there is clear and convincing evidence to the contrary.  In keeping with the recently negotiated USMCA free trade agreement, Canada is required to do the same thereby further escalating a trade war with China.

2024:  October 1, Canada imposed a 100% tariff on Chinese electric vehicles, again to align itself with US policy, and once again escalating a trade war with China.

2025:  January 20, Donald Trump is inaugurated as US President and announces a 25% tariff on Canadian imports, effectively reneging on the USMCA.  Nonetheless Canada continues to impose its 100% tariff on Chinese vehicles. 

2025:  China retaliates with 100% tariffs on Canadian canola, seafood and pork.  

Just a thought:  maybe we shouldn't have arrested Meng in the first place.

   

In the Midst of Canada's Existential Crisis, Alberta Premier, Danielle Smith, Escalates Hostilities with Canada's Federal Government.

 This is cut and paste from Edmonton Journal.

Smith targets ‘unconstitutional federal overreach' with new Alberta legislation

“These amendments we're introducing today would include denying federal workers access to our facilities and the information they contain."

Author of the article:

Jackie Carmichael

Published Mar 19, 2025  •  4 minute read

222 Comments

New legislation will set the province as gatekeeper of emissions information about Alberta’s energy industry, banning federal workers’ “interference” from collecting Alberta emissions data.

Premier Danielle Smith on Wednesday pushed back against the federal emissions cap and what she called “unconstitutional federal overreach.”

Since the province owns the resources it licenses to companies to extract, it’s the only source that counts, Smith said.

Bill 45’s changes to the Critical Infrastructure Defence Act were tabled Wednesday.

“These amendments we’re introducing today would include denying federal workers access to our facilities and the information they contain,” she said.

The legislation designates oil and gas production sites and facilities where emissions data and records are held as “essential infrastructure.”

“This amendment to the Critical Infrastructure Defence Act provides an extra tool to safeguard essential infrastructure from interference, and that includes interference from Ottawa,” Smith said, referencing Section 92 of the Canadian constitution, “which gives the province, not the federal government, the exclusive jurisdiction over non-renewable natural resource development.”

No ‘single source truth for emissions data’

Conflicting conclusions between federal and provincial numbers has been a problem, Smith said, citing methane emission calculations by the province versus the federal government.

“Well, this is part of the issue is that we don’t have a single source of truth for emissions data,” she said.

“If we’re going to have these kinds of disputes, we know that there needs to be a single source of truth when it comes to actual on-site data, and we’re going to collect that, and then we’ll make sure that it is shared,” she said.

“We believe that, because the federal government has come up with different numbers at different times for their own purposes, we think that we actually need to get real data, and because we’re the ones on the ground, we’ll be the ones able to do that work. This bill doesn’t explicitly ban initial data reporting by private companies to the federal government. They will report to us, it’s our data, and then we will report to the federal government. Remember the energy companies, especially since we own the resource and we permit the resource, they develop the resource on our behalf. And so in doing so, we have an obligation to collect the data, and we’ll report it to the to the federal government,” she said.

Hiking production and pipelines

In the same announcement, Smith reinforced prior commitments to upping oil and gas extraction, and pipeline construction east, west and north. 

“Alberta will continue in its pursuit of doubling our oil and gas production to meet the growing global demand for energy, and we will not let Ottawa stand in our way. We will not tolerate the continuous unconstitutional overreaches made by the Federal Liberal government measures like the emissions cap, the net zero electricity regs, the net zero electric vehicle mandate. And the energy industry advertising ban must be stopped now,” Smith said.

The legislation comes at a time of transition as Prime Minister Mark Carney assumed leadership last week after Justin Trudeau resigned.

Smith invoked the recent escalating tariff wars started by U.S. President Donald Trump as proof that “now more than ever that Canada must build big and build fast to reach new global markets for export.”

“Canadians and politicians from across the country are calling for new pipelines to be built east, west and north to secure our future and end our reliance upon our southern trading partner,” she said.

Her comments came with shades of warning for the newly sworn-in Carney.

“However, if the new prime minister wants to resume an old fight, well, we will. We’ll fight tooth and nail, because if we can’t make these decisions and build when it’s so obvious and it’s so obviously in the national interest, then what kind of an economic future does Canada have? Today’s amendments are a warning, but they’re also an invitation to Ottawa. Let’s talk. Let’s rise to the occasion. Let’s use Canada’s riches to protect our nation,” she said.

Premier Danielle Smith defends Florida speaking trip as anti-tariff effort

 Cut and paste from Calgary Herald.  BTW, Prager U is not a university.  It is a propaganda tool of right -wing American conservatives.  Largely financed by the KOCH brothers who own the American refinery that processes most of Alberta's oil.  See Foreign Interference in Canadian Elections.

Postmedia Calgary , Noah Brennan

Sun, March 16, 2025 at 7:32 PM EDT·4 min read

Alberta’s premier says her upcoming speaking appearance with conservative media personality Ben Shapiro is a continuation of the necessary “quiet diplomacy” she’s employed to gain the attention of U.S. President Donald Trump amid a heated trade war.

Danielle Smith has faced calls to cancel her advertised attendance at the March 27 fundraiser for Florida-based PragerU.

Shapiro is the outspoken co-founder of conservative media company The Daily Wire and former editor-in-chief of Breitbart News. He’s drawn criticism for past homophobic remarks and more recent posts supporting Canada becoming the 51st American state.

On her call-in radio show Saturday, Smith said it’s important she speak with those who have the president’s attention.

“You talk to the influencers. That’s the key insight that people should see,” Smith said.

“I can yell from the rooftops here all that I want, but it’s far more influential for someone close to the president, that he respects, making the same case for us.”

Tickets for the “East Coast Gala” are being sold for US$1,500.

Lori Williams, a political science professor at Mount Royal University, says Smith’s upcoming appearance with Shapiro differs from her past engagements with figures like Tucker Carlson or Jordan Peterson for a couple of reasons.

One distinction, Williams said, is that the event where Smith will share the stage with Shapiro is a fundraiser in support of PragerU.

Williams also highlighted Shapiro’s recent social media posts suggesting Canada should become the 51st U.S. state, noting that Smith’s participation at the conference places her alongside someone who appears to disrespect Canadian sovereignty at a politically sensitive time.

“When we take Canada, you will be expelled to Panama to work the canal,” Shapiro posted on X in response to a post made by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in January.

Sharing the stage with Shapiro is “something that’s not going to sit well with most Canadians,” Williams said. “Even in her base, I think there are a lot of patriotic Canadians who aren’t going to particularly like the idea of her appearing to take too lightly … disrespect for Canada’s sovereignty.”

As for Smith’s claim that Shapiro has influence with Donald Trump, Williams is skeptical.

“I don’t know that that particular argument works very well,” she said. “Even though Shapiro seems to be embracing Trump’s position on the 51st state rhetoric … he has spoken out against the tariffs on Canada. So I have no idea if Donald Trump is listening to anybody.”

Williams noted it’s become “very difficult” and “exceedingly unpredictable” to know who Trump listens to and communicates with.

“(Trump’s) advisors say something isn’t going to happen and it does, or they say something is going to happen and it (doesn’t),” Williams said.

Alberta NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi last week urged Smith to cancel the appearance, saying it would be “despicable” for her to speak at the Florida event.

“These are not the kind of people that Albertans want her associating with,” Nenshi told reporters.

Smith reiterates support of ‘proportionate’ approach to tariffs

Smith said it’s important she and other opponents of tariffs address the likes of Shapiro — who has millions of followers on social media — and PragerU, who have spoken out against tariffs imposed by Trump.

“They think that tariffing Canada is dumb. They were very open about that and I want to be able to make sure that entire audience of influencers has all of my talking points so they can be making them every single place that they can so we can get to the finish line, which is tariff-free relationship on every product,” Smith said.

Asked why she has not offered a more aggressive response to U.S. tariffs, as Ontario Premier Doug Ford has, Smith reiterated her support of a measured, “proportionate” approach.

Ford threatened last week to slap an added 25 per cent charge on Ontario’s electricity exports to three northern U.S. states. Trump responded by declaring he’d double steel and aluminum duties on Canada, leading Ford to drop his proposed surcharge.

Trump went ahead Wednesday with an additional 25 per cent import tariff on all steel and aluminum imports into the U.S., including from Canada.

Trump placed 25 per cent tariffs on some products coming from Canada and Mexico in early March — and 10 per cent on energy — while pausing others for 30 days.

Smith has repeatedly resisted calls — including from Ford — to consider Alberta’s energy exports as a retaliatory bargaining chip in the ongoing trade dispute.

“If you come to a gun fight with a knife, you really are going to be at the bad end of that,” she said.

“The Americans have more levers to cause harm in an energy war, particularly to Ontario and Quebec. They may not realize that I’m defending them but I absolutely am. You just don’t mess with energy.”

— With files from The Canadian Press

Why Are We Canadians Causing a Trade War with China at this Moment

Cut and paste from CBC 

Sask. premier warns that Chinese tariffs on canola would be ruinous

Alexander Quon, Chris Edwards | CBC News | Posted: March 12, 2025 5:39 PM | Last Updated: 17 hours ago

Premier Scott Moe also took aim at 25 per cent U.S. steel tariffs

Image | Scott Moe - SARM 2025

Caption: Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe warned of the threat posed by Chinese counter tariffs on canola. The 100 per cent tariff is set to kick in March 20, 2025. (Chanss Lagaden/CBC News)

Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe lashed out at American and Chinese tariffs on Wednesday, saying they will have a devastating impact on Saskatchewan workers.

"Make no mistake — a 100 per cent tariff on Chinese canola and meal exports, alongside the challenge that we're seeing in the United States with the on and off again tariffs on various products, will decimate the canola industry in Saskatchewan," Moe said at the annual Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities (SARM) conference in Saskatoon on Wednesday.

"Immediately. In a matter of a number of weeks, not months."

China has announced that it will impose 100 per cent retaliatory tariffs targeting canola, as well as other Canadian goods like seafood and pork.

The decision comes in response to Canada's 100 per cent tariffs on Chinese-made electric vehicles and a 25 per cent levy on Chinese aluminum and steel products imposed on Oct. 1.

The Chinese tariffs are scheduled to kick in on March 20, just a day after the Saskatchewan budget is set to be introduced in the provincial legislature.

"I'm not sure you're going to hear the budget speak specifically to this, but you're gonna hear the Saskatchewan government speak specifically to this," Moe said.

The premier said no one wants to buy Chinese electric vehicles in Canada, and moving to protect Canadian and American car industries is directly harming agriculturally-based provinces like Saskatchewan.

• Saskatchewan farmers brace as China imposes tariffs on crops

• Sask. gov to stick with U.S. booze and materials pause after Trump postpones tariffs

Moe's ire was not just focused on the incoming Canola tariffs. On Wednesday morning, 25 per cent tariffs on all imports of steel and aluminum to the United States officially came into force.

In response, the Canadian government announced a new set of 25 per cent tariffs on $29.8 billion worth of American imports. They include $12.6 billion worth of steel products, $3 billion worth of aluminum products and $14.2 billion worth of other goods. They are ti go into effect at 12:01 a.m. EDT on Thursday.

Those new tariffs are on top of the federal government's first retaliatory tariffs announced earlier this month, which applied to $30 billion worth of American goods and are to be increased to $155 billion at the end of March. The federal government said they will remain in place until all American tariffs are lifted.

Moe confirmed that Saskatchewan's retaliatory measures announced last week will also remain in place. They include blocking the Saskatchewan Liquor and Gaming Authority (SLGA) from buying and distributing U.S.-made alcohol, and pausing future government capital projects to assess how American contractors and suppliers could be minimized.

"Things are changing literally by the hour," Moe said. "And we've seen that over the course of the last number of weeks. So a calm hand is necessary."

Image | Saskatchewan NDP Shadow Minister for Economy and Jobs Aleana Young

Caption: Saskatchewan NDP economy and jobs critic Aleana Young says the Sask. Party hasn't done enough to stand up for steel workers. (Krik Fraser)

Aleana Young, the Saskatchewan NDP's economy and jobs critic, said at a separate news conference in Regina on Wednesday that the government should prioritize Canadian steel manufacturers.

"Stop using steel from outside of Canada, stop using cheap Chinese steel, stop using U.S. companies when it comes to building projects here in Saskatchewan," Young said.

More than half of Saskatchewan's exports go to the United States, totalling about $26.7 billion in 2024. About three quarters of those were from one of four products: crude oil, potash, canola oil and uranium.

According to Statistics Canada, in 2024 Saskatchewan exported $387 million worth of iron and steel products and $26 million worth of aluminum to the United States.

Regina is home to one of 13 steel plants in Canada. It's run by Ervaz plc, a steel manufacturing and mining company based in the United Kingdom.

According to United Steelworkers Local 5890 President Mike Day, about 30 per cent of the steel produced at the facility is shipped to a sister plant in the U.S.

"Right now everything is up in the air and we don't know what the next move is," said Patrick Veinot, a staff representative for United Steelworkers. "It's important that we get together and we discuss it. All parties, all stakeholders. That includes finance, that includes business, that includes the unions, you know, as organized labour.

"Everybody needs to sit at a table and discuss this."