Posts

Showing posts with the label Meng extradition

"Judicial Independence" in Canadian Extradition Law

Image
The Canadian Extradition Act There is no "judicial independence" in Canadian extradition law.  Louise Arbour,  former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights , justice of the Supreme Court of Canada and Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunals , has been trying to educate the Canadian public on this basic fact in Canadian law. The Canadian Extradition Act is available online and is clear (and I encourage you to click the hyperlink), in Canada, extradition is, ultimately, the responsibility of the executive branch of government (meaning the politicians we elect) not the judiciary.  Despite the obvious letter of the law, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau continues to stubbornly repeat the fallacy that " judicial independence " must be maintained in the Meng extradition trial. His use of the phrase "judicial independence" is proof that he has never looked at the Canadian Extradition Act .  Imagine: in a matter of minutes, anyone with an inter

How Did Canada Lose to Norway and Ireland in Its Campaign for a UN Security Council Seat?

Image
The Basics:   The United Nations was formed in 1945, at the end of World War II.  There were 51 member countries.  Harry S. Truman was President of the USA and the UN's home was established in New York City. The goal of the United Nations is world peace and security. The Security Council is the power center of the UN.  It has five permanent members, the "big" winners of WWII:  the USA, France, the UK, Russia, and China. On a rotational basis, other countries are elected by all 193 members of the UN General Assembly to occupy temporary, 2-year positions in the Security Council. There are currently 10 temporary (non-permanent, 2-year) positions in the Security Council. The permanent members have remained the same since 1945. The non-permanent positions are elected on a geographical basis, so Canada was competing against Ireland and Norway in what is known as the "Weog block" (Western Europe and Others). In the 2020, three-country competition for two Secu

Extradition from Canada to the USA: Why Meng's Chances of a Favourable Canadian Verdict Are Slim

Extradition by the numbers This Extradition Fact Sheet from a Government of Canada website provides statistics on Canada-to-the-USA extradition cases over a ten year period from 2008 to 2018.  As you can see, once a  case is before a Canadian judge (as Meng's is now) only 8 times ( total number of discharges/refusals in 10 years ) of 798 US extradition requests has the court ruled in favour of the individual resisting extradition--roughly 1% of the time. Fiscal Year Table note  * Total number of requests Arrests ATP’s Issued Order of Committals  Total number of discharges/ refusals Withdrawals Total number of people surrendered 2008-2009 97 84 67 40 0 1 61 2009-2010 118 65 63 30 1 3 49 2010-2011 132 71 58 16 1 6 61 2011-2012 117 93 72 31 0 2 81 2012-2013 101 95 66 34 3 6 65 2013-2014 53 49 43 34 1 7 58 2014-2015 47 53 38 29 1 5 52 2015-2016 44 34 30 29 0 2 41 2016-2017 40 35 32 21 1 6 49 2017-2018 49 47 38 23 0 2 35 TOTAL 798 626 507 287 8 40 552  A CBC News r

Canadian Politicians Were Caught Like Deer in the Headlights, but Why Are Canadian Journalists Censuring any Discussion of the Merits of Meng's Case?

Image
"The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum."                                                                                        Noam Chomsky          HSBC, "the victim," doesn't want to prosecute After the G20 summit, President Trump let it be known that he is backtracking on the Huawei ban. Bloomberg and the  Financial Times  are reporting that  HSBC is telling Beijing "It Is Not to Blame for Huawei CFO Arrest."   Where does that leave us?  Let's see:  HSBC is, according to the  Grand Jury indictment , supposed to be the victim of Meng Wanzhou's alleged bank fraud.  The only evidence against Meng, according to the indictment, is a meeting she had with an HSBC executive and an accompanying Power Point presentation.  If the "plaintiff" and the "victim" are backing away from the case, the original warrant

9,000 SNC-Lavalin Jobs Versus 250,000 Canadians Who Make Their Income from Canola

Image
Canola matters! Watching CPAC the other day I was taken aback to read the caption that 250,000 Canadians, including 43,000  farmers, make their incomes from the sale of canola.  (See https://www.canolacouncil.org/markets-stats/industry-overview/ for more.) 40% of Canada's canola is sold to China.  China is currently blocking all imports of Canadian canola on the grounds that it contains contaminants.  (Remember when George W. Bush blocked the importation of Canadian beef for two years? I actually know some Canadian beef producers who went bankrupt as a result.) An exercise in futility In Canada the common presumption is that the Chinese blockade is retaliation for the fact that we continue to hold Sabrina Meng Wanzhou, the Huawei CFO, under house arrest pending extradition.  This Chinese retaliation is outrageous, unfair, unjust; therefore, it's time for all of us Canadians to get together and scream and howl and whine and throw tantrums at one another.  Feel better?