Conservative, Liberal, Socialist: The Basics I used to baseline the three dominant political positions this way: a conservative wants the country to stay more or less the way it is or has been, a socialist wants society to change and a liberal believes that everything will turn out fine if we do nothing. Logically, the Conservative Party tends to attract the well-to-do who are enjoying the status quo. A left-leaning party like the NDP (the only party I've ever been a member of) will find its numbers in the working and lower middle class. The Liberal Party enjoys the advantage of the middle-class, middle ground while appearing socialist in public and being conservative in private. The problem of the Liberal Party isn't so much hypocrisy (though some might rightly call it such) as coherence. (See Truth and Coherence .) Me a Liberal?!! Okay, Maybe Sometimes. My lefty friends have occasionally accused me of being a liberal. My conservative friends think I'm a l
Showing posts from January, 2019
A Dozen Reasons Why the Canadian Minister of Justice Should Release the Huawei CFO, Sabrina Meng Wanzhou
- Other Apps
The "Canadian Extradition Act" Gives the Minister of Justice the Right and Obligation to Release Meng It's becoming more and more obvious in the media (social, anti-social and other) that the request for Sabrina Meng Wanzhou's extradition is bogus. Contrary to what you may have read or heard from Canadian politicians about extradition proceedings being out of the hands of the political leadership, the Canadian Extradition Act clearly states that : "The Minister [of Justice] is responsible for the implementation of extradition agreements, the administration of this Act and dealing with requests for extradition made under them." (For more see Was Freeland Lying? and How Canada Arrested a Chinese Exec .) According to The Act, the Canadian Minister of Justice, Jody Wilson-Raybould , can and should intervene in an extradition if she considers it "unjust" after reviewing "all the relevant circumstances." She can " at any time w
When Chrystia Freeland Said that the Extradition of Huawei CFO, Sabrina Meng Wanzhou, Was Strictly a Judicial Affair, Was She Lying? Or Just Avoiding the Truth?
- Other Apps
Generally, I have been a Freeland admirer (see Saint Mathew Pray for Us ). I sympathized as she stood beside Mike Pompeo at a Washington press conference and had to come up with six different ways of saying that the arrest, detention and possible extradition of Huawei CFO, Sabrina Meng Wanzhou, was strictly a judicial affair--and in a "rule of law" country like Canada, the process was immune from political interference. I believed her. I had already read the same claim in half a dozen news reports. I repeated the claim myself. When a claim gets repeated that often, it's hard to resist the idea that it must be true. Then, I had a look at the Canadian Extradition Act . Here is what the Extradition Act actually says: Withdrawal of the authority to proceed (3) The Minister may at any time withdraw the authority to proceed and, if the Minister does so, the court shall discharge the person and set aside any order made respecting their judicial interim releas